CJEL


Kevin J. Lynch – The law of takings receives much attention from courts and scholars.  Yet much of that attention focuses on the questions of whether or not a taking has occurred, or whether the taking was for a public use.  Less attention has focused on the appropriate measure of just compensation.  This is understandable, because in many cases the requirement to pay just compensation would be too burdensome on the government, particularly in the more recent line of regulatory takings cases, and so if a taking is found, the government simply abandons its regulation and pays no or reduced compensation.   Nevertheless, courts have attempted to grapple with the just compensation question and developed a variety of approaches that might be used to determine damages for takings on a case-by-case basis.  Yet the lack of clear guidance from the courts and the potential for high damages awards due to the […]

A Fracking Mess: Just Compensation for Regulatory Takings of Oil and Gas Property Rights


Rebecca Bratspies – On August 19, 2006, citizens of Côte d’ Ivoire woke to suffocating odors. Overnight, five-hundred tons of hazardous waste had been illegally dumped across the country’s largest city, Abidjan.  Thousands were sickened.  The incident stands as one of the most flagrant environmental crimes in recent memory.  Now, more than a decade later, it is past time to examine the tragedy as an act of environmental corruption and to use the incident to draw lessons about the failures of global environmental governance.  The case is particularly instructive because the multi-national oil-trading company involved, Trafigura, has recently been back in this news; this time because of South Korean allegations that the company was involved in oil shipments to North Korea in violation of United Nations (“UN”) Sanctions. With regard to the dumping in Côte d’ Ivoire, Trafigura “strenuously maintains that it did nothing wrong and its staff acted in […]

Corrupt at Its Core: How Law Failed the Victims of Waste Dumping in Côte d’ ...


Lee C. Rarrick – [C]omprehensive and undefined presidential powers hold both practical advantages and grave dangers for the country . . . . -Justice Jackson The power of executive review remains imperfectly limited and defined—it therefore holds such potential dangers and advantages.  By executive review I mean the power of the President to interpret the law and determine for himself whether a given law or provision is constitutional.  Most commentators agree that this power exists legitimately in one form or another.  But some argue that it is virtually unbounded, save for the president’s own sense of deference to the other branches and his self-interest to remain in office.  Such a comprehensive power surely is as dangerous as that of which Justice Jackson warns in his concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, if not more so.  Moreover, if fully utilized, executive review would leave the judiciary with no […]

Executive Review and the Youngstown Categories: Vulnerability of Environmental Regulations to Unbounded Executive Review



Christian Termyn – Most American Indian rights to water trace their origins to 19th century treaty negotiations with the United States.  The 1908 Supreme Court case Winters v. United States established that the federal statutes and treaties setting aside land for Indian reservations also impliedly reserved sufficient water to fulfill the purpose of those reservations.  In the century since Winters, the development of a legal doctrine around reserved water rights has centered largely on defining and quantifying the amount of water to which tribes are entitled.  With an increasing number of tribes holding quantified water rights, a more recent project (and the broad focus of this Note) seeks to integrate tribal water use within the dominant system of western water law: state prior appropriation doctrine. Where water is scarce, even a slight change in practice by one water user may affect the availability of water to other users of a […]

Federal Indian Reserved Water Rights and the No Harm Rule


Augusta Wilson – Despite the strong consensus in the scientific community that anthropogenic climate change requires urgent attention, neither the United States nor Canada has implemented a comprehensive national policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  Into this void have stepped two regional cap-and-trade programs that regulate greenhouse gas emissions in parts of both countries.  One, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (“RGGI”), is a partnership of nine states in the northeastern and mid-Atlantic U.S.  The other, the Western Climate Initiative (the “WCI”), is a partnership between California and the Provinces of Québec and Ontario.   Both programs have been operating for several years, demonstrating that cap-and-trade programs can achieve cost- effective emissions reductions.   Nonetheless, both markets have faced difficulties at various points, including volatility of allowance prices and the withdrawal of partner jurisdictions. One often-cited mechanism for improving the functioning of cap-and-trade markets is to link them with other markets.  In this […]

Linking Across Borders: Opportunities and Obstacles for a Joint Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative-Western Climate Initiative ...


Justin Gundlach – This Article assumes that the federal government will assign a price to carbon dioxide emissions via legislation by the early 2020s for one or more of myriad reasons.  This Article’s purpose, however, is not to substantiate that assumption, but to explore a particular aspect of the adoption of such legislation.  The contents of that legislation will reflect negotiated agreements—built on various political tradeoffs—over a host of policy issues, ranging from taxes to energy efficiency standards.  These tradeoffs would implicate not only the tax’s scope and rate, but also the policies with which the tax would interact.  This Article describes interactions between a carbon tax and various existing and proposed policies relating to climate change, energy, and environmental protection.  It proceeds in five parts: Part II highlights three key points of background; Part III summarizes the universe of policies that can be expected to interact with a carbon […]

To Negotiate a Carbon Tax: A Rough Map of Interactions, Tradeoffs, and Risks



Sean M. Kammer & Sarah E. Christopherson –   It has been over half a century since Kenneth Boulding introduced the metaphor of the Earth as a “spaceship.” In his compelling analogy he argued that, due to increasing human demands, the Earth was becoming more like a spaceship carrying limited supplies (and limited capacity to receive pollution) than an open prairie spreading endlessly to the horizon.  In what he called the “cowboy economy,” “consumption is regarded as a good thing and production likewise,” with the economy’s success being measured solely “by the amount of the throughput from the ‘factors of production.’”  Boulding pointed out that a portion of this throughput is necessarily “extracted from the reservoirs of raw materials and noneconomic objects” and that another part consists of “output into the reservoirs of pollution.”  In the “spaceman economy,” in contrast, “throughput is by no means a desideratum, and is indeed […]

Reserving a Place for Nature on Spaceship Earth: Rethinking the Role of Conservation Easements


Gwendolyn J. Gordon – Parks are people too, my friend.  So quipped an August 2016 headline making reference at once to Mitt Romney’s flip commentary on corporations and to recent developments in New Zealand law enabling landscapes to be named as legal persons—that is, as entities possessing juridical rights akin to those of corporations.  In the wake of this and other developments of the concept, legal personhood has struck observers as a promising tool for protecting nature—an idea overdue given the now seemingly unexceptional nature of corporate personhood in protecting corporate rights.  Far from being the settled, stolid doctrine that its long tenure might have it appear to be, however, corporate personhood is quicksilver; it seems an endlessly adaptable concept.  How might we come to understand the environment as a similarly flexible rights-holder in a way that is robustly protective of environmental interests?  This Article argues that, as an example […]

Environmental Personhood


Emily Hush – It is no secret that the planet is warming and that humans have had something to do with it.  Over the last one hundred and fifty years, the global average concentration of carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere has increased to unprecedented levels and continues to rise.  As the climate becomes warmer, the world will face ocean acidification, sea level rise, decreasing biodiversity, and more extreme weather events. At the end of the twentieth century, many nations recognized that climate change is a global phenomenon requiring cooperative action, and began to seek international solutions to prevent disastrous warming and to mitigate unavoidable impacts.  Sustainable development is central to this international response to climate change.  International agreements like the United Nations Framework on Climate Change and the Paris Agreement are indispensable to furthering sustainable development worldwide.  However, the complexity of such large multilateral agreements presents a barrier to […]

Where No Man Has Gone Before: The Future of Sustainable Development in the Comprehensive Economic ...



Alessandra Mistura – The publication of a Policy Paper on Case Selection and Prioritization (the “Policy Paper”) by the Office of the Prosecutor (“OTP”) of the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) in September 2016 has reignited the longstanding discussion about the status of environmental crimes under international law.  The Policy Paper expressed the intention of the OTP to consider, in the selection of crimes to be submitted to the jurisdiction of the ICC, those committed through, or resulting in, “the destruction of the environment, the illegal exploitation of natural resources or the illegal dispossession of land.”  Such wording soon gained widespread attention, prompting many news outlets to declare that, from now on, the ICC would focus on prosecuting “environmental crimes.”  The news sources’ enthusiasm, however, appears misplaced for several reasons. The first and foremost objection comes from a consideration of the ICC’s limited jurisdiction.  In fact, this is strictly confined by […]

Is There Space for Environmental Crimes Under International Criminal Law? The Impact of the Office ...


By Patrick Maguire — While campaigning for the presidency, then-candidate Donald Trump promised his supporters he would build a wall on the southern border of the United States to thwart the flow of immigration from Mexico.  President Trump appears determined to follow through on his promise.  On January 25, 2017, five days after being inaugurated, the President issued an executive order with the goal to “secure the southern border of the United States through the immediate construction of a physical wall on the southern border.”  According to the order, the authority to build a wall is derived from the Secure Fence Act of 2006, a statute that has already been utilized to construct physical barriers along the border with Mexico.  This order, along with the President’s executive order banning the immigration of refugees, has incited a firestorm of protests across the country.  While the debate has justifiably focused on the […]

Can Trump Build a Wall? The Administrative Obstacles to the Border Wall


Zhou Chen – On August 1, 2016, the New York Public Service Commission issued an Order Adopting a Clean Energy Standard, the most comprehensive and ambitious clean energy mandate in the state’s history.  The CES Order adopts the goal that fifty percent of New York’s electricity is to be generated by renewable sources by 2030 as part of a strategy to reduce statewide greenhouse gas emissions by forty percent by 2030.  As expected, fossil fuel generation interests mounted challenges to the CES Order, touting concerns over, among other issues, eligibility standards, procedural deficiencies, and jurisdictional competency.  On December 15, 2016, the PSC issued an Order on Petitions for Rehearing that summarily dismissed these concerns.  This Field Report focuses on the challenge to the PSC’s jurisdictional competency in enacting the CES Order in Coalition for Competitive Electricity v. Zibelman.

Jurisdictional Challenges to New York’s Clean Energy Standard